by Walter Brasch
My wife,
Rosemary, a registered Republican, received a black and white poll in the mail.
Plastered across the top of the sheet in bold black letters was the title: “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.” I wonder who that
could be.
On to the
questions. All she had to do was to check the appropriate box and return the
ballot. The survey indicated name, survey number, and a processing code, all
with a bar code for identification. She
just had to check the appropriate box beneath a picture of Donald Trump,
Hillary Clinton, or “no opinion.” Seemed simple enough.
First question:
“Hillary Clinton is working hard to win the White House so she can carry
forward Barack Obama’s disastrous policies—including increased taxes—which have
been so harmful to our nation’s economy. Donald Trump is dedicated to lowering
taxes and instituting responsible reforms that will create jobs, strengthen
free enterprise and boost economic growth. Which candidate do you trust more to
put America on a secure and prosperous economic path.”
Gee, this is a
hard one. Let’s think about it awhile. OK, time’s up. I guess, based upon the
question, the demon Clinton wasn’t the right answer. Rosemary needed to check
Trump as the one to keep the country moving forward.
There were nine
questions, all similar to the first one. The other questions had to do with the
federal debt, foreign policy, the nomination of federal judges, immigration,
environment, and ObamaCare. The ninth one asked the most vital question: “Are
you willing to financially help the Trump Make America Great Again Committee in
making sure our nation finally leaves behind the ruinous policies of the past
eight years and elects a Republican president who will Make America Great Again?”
Below that
question was a form to fill out to donate. All my wife had to do was to check
one of the boxes of suggested donations, starting with $35 and increasing to
$5,000; fill in the boxes with her occupation, employer, phone number, email
address, and credit card information, and mail it back in a postage-paid
envelope. She could also call a campaign number and give them her personal
information and make that donation. She chose an alternate procedure. She
didn’t fill out the poll, which was a not-so-subtle way to withdraw money from
her wallet, and sent them a bookmark for my latest book. (I do that for all
junk mail that includes a self-addressed stamped envelope, especially one that
wants money. I doubt anyone is really tabulating the results—or even cares
about the answers.)
What came in
the mail was a “push poll.” The questions were designed to “push” the recipient
to vote for the preferred answers, to make the politician’s supporters believe
they matter, and to energize the base of the support. Most push polls are
designed to attack an opponent in a political race. A legitimate poll is drawn
from a random sample of voters, has no identification of whom the recipient is,
has neutral questions, and doesn’t want money. The results are tabulated,
analyzed, and published. But why analyze and publish the results when more than
90 percent of the recipients of the poll are going to be pushed in the
direction that the not-so-independent campaign committee wants. The only real
analysis of those who send out push polls is who gave what amount and is there
a correlation to determine how many more attempts—by email, by phone—the campaign committee should devote
to getting even more money. Rosemary usually just trashes the myriad requests
for money to help Republican candidates.
Unfortunately,
the Trump committee isn’t alone in using this tactic. The first push poll was
in 1946 when Richard Nixon ran for Congress and used the technique by direct
mail and phone “interviews” to drop fear that the sitting congressman, Jerry
Voohis, who represented a southern California district, was a communist. Nixon
began his political career; Voorhis, who wasn’t a communist, lost his. George
W. Bush used push polls extensively in his first race for the governorship of
Texas and again in his campaign for the presidency.
The Democrats
use it continuously, also sliding in huge globules of fear in each question, to
solicit funds. The Democrats usually have space to enter comments. Usually, I
don’t answer the poll. With Democrats, I will often write a note about the
unfairness of the poll, ask them to contact me when they want my real opinions,
and put a bookmark into the return envelope. So far, no one from the Hillary
Clinton campaign or the Democratic National Committee has called to solicit my
professional opinion or assistance—and to my knowledge, no one has bought any
books.
[Dr. Brasch is an award-winning journalist who has covered politics/government and social issues for more than four decades. His latest book is Fracking America: Sacrificing Health and the Environment for Short-Term Economic Benefit.]
[Dr. Brasch is an award-winning journalist who has covered politics/government and social issues for more than four decades. His latest book is Fracking America: Sacrificing Health and the Environment for Short-Term Economic Benefit.]
No comments:
Post a Comment